Are you looking for the Classworks Special Education program from TouchMath? Click here to go to their site.

Classwork Logo

The Effective Schools Framework: A Roadmap for Instructionally Supportive Cultures

From Compliance to Culture

Building an instructionally supportive culture takes more than adopting new tests or dashboards. It requires changing how districts operate—how time is used, how teachers learn, and how leaders prioritize growth over compliance.

The Texas Education Agency’s Effective Schools Framework (ESF) provides a model for this transformation. While designed for Texas, its core principles apply nationwide.

A group of school administrators in a meeting reviewing the Texas Education Agency's Effective Schools Framework (ESF) on a large monitor, discussing the alignment of leadership, school culture, and high-quality instructional materials.

Why the Effective Schools Framework Matters

The ESF identifies five levers of school improvement:

  • Strong School Leadership and Planning

  • Effective, Well-Supported Teachers

  • Positive School Culture

  • High-Quality Instructional Materials (HQIM)

  • Effective Instructional Practices and Data Use

Each lever describes not only what to do but how districts can align systems to sustain improvement.

Alignment: The Missing Ingredient

Instructionally supportive systems don’t appear overnight. They require intentional alignment among:

  • Class schedules that allow for reteach and enrichment time,

  • Professional development focused on instructional decision-making,

  • Curriculum teams that coordinate pacing and standards coverage,

  • PLCs that use shared formative data, and

  • Leadership structures that protect time for data-informed collaboration.

The Effective Schools Framework provides a blueprint for achieving this alignment.

How ESF Drives Instructionally Supportive Practices

The ESF assumes that effective schools are not simply well-managed—they are learning organizations where teachers continuously improve practice through feedback and reflection.

By combining formative assessment, data-driven instruction, and targeted coaching, schools become ecosystems of continuous improvement.

Classwork.com supports these ESF priorities by:

  • Providing actionable daily data that makes learning visible,

  • Enabling curriculum-aligned formative assessments, and

  • Helping districts measure instructional impact across classrooms.

 

Lessons for Other States

While the ESF is Texas-specific, every state can benefit from its insights:

  • Leadership pipelines must support instructional depth, not just compliance.

  • Curriculum adoption must come with data and professional learning supports.

  • Schools need structures—like PLCs and reteach blocks—that make data-driven instruction feasible.

Instructionally supportive cultures arise when assessment and instruction are viewed as one process, not two.

Conclusion

The Effective Schools Framework is more than a compliance tool—it’s a vision for sustainable instructional growth.

Districts that align leadership, time, materials, and professional learning around student evidence build systems that adapt to change and produce results.

Classwork.com helps districts operationalize that vision—connecting instructional materials, data, and teacher collaboration into a single system for improvement.

References

  • Fullan, M. (2014). The Principal: Three Keys to Maximizing Impact. Jossey-Bass.
  • Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (2011). Linking Leadership to Student Learning. Jossey-Bass.

 This article is part of The Future of Instructionally Supportive Assessment white paper. Read the full series here.

What are the five core levers of the Effective Schools Framework (ESF)? The ESF identifies five essential levers for school improvement: Strong School Leadership and Planning; Effective, Well-Supported Teachers; Positive School Culture; High-Quality Instructional Materials (HQIM); and Effective Instructional Practices and Data Use. These levers provide a blueprint for moving a district from a focus on administrative compliance to a culture of instructional growth.

How does the ESF shift the focus from compliance to a “learning organization”? Rather than simply checking boxes for state requirements, the ESF treats schools as learning organizations where teachers and leaders continuously improve through feedback and reflection. This shift is achieved by protecting time for collaboration, providing targeted coaching, and ensuring that assessment and instruction are viewed as a single, integrated process.

Why is “intentional alignment” necessary for an instructionally supportive culture? Instructionally supportive systems require more than just new technology; they need structural alignment. This means ensuring that class schedules include dedicated reteach and enrichment blocks, that professional development is focused on data-driven decision-making, and that leadership structures protect the time necessary for Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) to analyze shared formative data.

How can districts outside of Texas apply the principles of the ESF? While the ESF is a Texas model, its universal lessons apply to any state. Key takeaways include building leadership pipelines that prioritize instructional depth over paperwork, ensuring curriculum adoptions are supported by real-time data, and creating school-level structures—like reteach blocks—that make acting on student evidence a feasible daily routine for teachers.